At Tuijin Jishu - The Journal of Propulsion Technology, we believe that rigorous peer review is essential for ensuring the quality and validity of the research published in our journal. Our peer review process is designed to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity, objectivity, and fairness. Below is an overview of our peer review policy:

1. Double-Blind Peer Review:

Tuijin Jishu follows a double-blind peer review process, where the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. This approach ensures an impartial evaluation of the manuscript, as reviewers assess the content without any bias related to the authors' identity or affiliations.

2. Selection of Reviewers:

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject matter of the submitted manuscript. Our editorial team carefully chooses qualified reviewers who have relevant knowledge and experience in the specific area of propulsion technology covered by the submission.

3. Reviewer Confidentiality:

Reviewers are expected to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscripts they review. They should not disclose any information about the manuscript or its content to others without explicit permission from the journal.

4. Reviewer Guidelines:

Reviewers are provided with clear guidelines and evaluation criteria to assess the manuscript's scientific merit, originality, relevance, and clarity. They are encouraged to provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their work.

5. Timely Review Process:

We strive to ensure a timely review process. Reviewers are asked to complete their evaluations within the specified timeframe to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process.

6. Reviewer Comments and Decision Recommendations:

Reviewers are requested to provide detailed and objective comments on the manuscript's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Based on their evaluation, reviewers make one of the following recommendations to the editorial team:

• Acceptance: The manuscript meets the journal's criteria and can be accepted for publication without significant revisions.

• Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires minor revisions to address specific concerns raised by the reviewers.

• Major Revisions: The manuscript has substantial issues that need to be addressed. Authors are required to make significant revisions before reconsideration.

• Rejection: The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards or align with the scope of Tuijin Jishu, and thus, it is not suitable for publication in the journal.

7. Editorial Decision:

The final editorial decision is based on the reviewers' recommendations and the assessment of the editorial team. The decision is communicated to the authors along with the reviewers' comments to help them understand the rationale behind the verdict.

8. Appeals Process:

Authors have the right to appeal a decision if they believe there was an error in the review process. Appeals should be submitted to the journal's editorial office, and they will be carefully considered by the editorial team.

Tuijin Jishu is dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of peer review to uphold the integrity of the scientific literature and promote advancements in propulsion technology. We appreciate the invaluable contributions of our reviewers, whose expertise and efforts play a vital role in ensuring the quality and impact of the research we publish.