Linguistic Fallacies Due to the Wrong Use of Language on Social Media: A Sociolinguistic Analysis

Abstract

Social media platforms have transformed communication, introducing informal linguistic practices that foster fallacious reasoning. This study examines linguistic fallacies—equivocation, strawman, ad hominem, and false dichotomy—on platforms like Twitter (now X) and Reddit. Through content analysis of 600 posts and a survey of 200 users, we quantify fallacy prevalence, identify sociolinguistic drivers, and assess impacts on discourse. Results indicate 65% of posts contain fallacies, driven by anonymity, informality, and rapid communication. Users re- port frustration with fallacious discourse, yet only 32% can identify such errors, revealing a digital literacy gap. These fallacies amplify misinformation and polarization, necessitating educational and platform-based interventions. We propose digital literacy programs and stricter moderation to enhance online dialogue.