Exploring Alternative Funding Models to Enhance the Autonomy of Bangladesh’s Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC): A Survey-Based Quantitative Study

Abstract

This study examines the financial independence of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) of Bangladesh. Currently, the ACC depends entirely on government funding, which limits its operational autonomy. The study’s aim is to assess public and expert opinions on alternative funding sources, including asset recovery and fines, to enhance the ACC’s independence.

The research used a survey method to collect opinions from 100 respondents, including public members and experts. The data analysis focused on support levels for mixed funding models and legal reforms to allow the ACC to retain a portion of recovered funds. The study also reviewed international practices in anti-corruption agency funding for comparison.

Findings show strong public support for increasing the ACC’s financial independence. About 84% of respondents believe that financial autonomy will reduce corruption within the Commission. A similar percentage supports legal reforms for the ACC to use recovered assets and fines. These findings are aligned with international examples, where agencies like Hong Kong’s ICAC and Indonesia’s KPK have diversified funding sources to strengthen independence and effectiveness.

The study recommends that Bangladesh should consider a mixed funding model for the ACC. This model should combine government allocations with income from asset recovery and fines. Clear legal frameworks are essential to regulate this funding and ensure transparency. Capacity building for financial management and cooperation with international anti-corruption bodies will also support these efforts.

In conclusion, financial independence is critical for the ACC’s operational freedom and success. Adopting a mixed funding approach can help reduce political influence and enhance the ACC’s ability to fight corruption effectively. This will also improve public trust in the Commission.